The controversy surrounding the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2025 answer key is intensifying as the Supreme Court prepares to hear the case on February 6, 2025. Prospective candidates, particularly Aditya Singh, have raised concerns regarding the results of the exam, prompting legal action. This hearing is crucial as it could impact the future of numerous petitions filed across various courts in the country against the examination process. In parallel, another case involving respondent Ashlesha Ajitsaria will also be discussed.
Why Is This Hearing Significant?
This Supreme Court hearing holds immense importance due to the various petitions filed in lower courts concerning CLAT 2025. Previously, the matter was under review in High Court where several objections from the petitioner were dismissed. The Supreme Court hearing is expected to address these grievances as candidates seek justice.
Potential Outcomes of the Supreme Court’s Decision
Speculations suggest that the Supreme Court may decide on the transfer of CLAT 2025-related cases to a specific High Court. This directive aims to expedite proceedings and initiate the counseling process. During an earlier hearing on January 15, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the candidate’s petition, signaling that all pending cases related to CLAT 2025 may be relocated to the Punjab and Haryana High Court.
Understanding the CLAT 2025 Controversy
The Consortium of National Law Universities (CNLUs) published an answer key for CLAT 2025 U.G., which has faced scrutiny with many candidates lodging complaints regarding inaccuracies. The Delhi High Court has already amended the answer key in response to Aditya Singh’s petition and directed the issuance of a revised result. However, candidates have sought relief from the Supreme Court as three objections raised by them were dismissed at the High Court level.
Arguments from the Consortium of National Law Universities
The Consortium has opposed the High Court’s ruling, arguing that the CLAT 2025 answer key was crafted by academic experts and that the court should refrain from intervening as an educational authority. This legal standoff raises questions about the accountability and validity of the examination process.
| Event | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Supreme Court Hearing | February 6, 2025 | Discussion on petitions filed by CLAT candidates. |
| Previous Hearing | January 15, 2025 | Supreme Court declined candidate’s petition, indicating potential case transfers. |